Unveiling Freddie Highmore's Age: *Charlie And The Chocolate Factory* Secrets

Ever wondered what makes a child actor's performance truly captivating? The choice of Freddie Highmore, as Charlie Bucket in the 2005 "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory," was not mere happenstance; it was a meticulously crafted decision that underpinned the very soul of the film.

The 2005 Tim Burton reimagining of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" hinged on the casting of an actor of a very specific age to embody Charlie Bucket. This wasn't just about finding a child who could deliver lines; it was about capturing the essence of youthful innocence, vulnerability, and the wide-eyed wonder required to navigate the fantastical world of Willy Wonka. The actors age, therefore, became a non-negotiable cornerstone of the entire production, shaping the characters arc and the film's overall impact.

The actor's age, though seemingly a minor detail in the grand tapestry of filmmaking, held profound implications for the narrative. It wasn't merely a matter of chronological accuracy, but of thematic resonance. Childhood and naivety were not just plot devices; they were the heart and soul of the story. The actors age became intrinsically linked to the film's ability to evoke a sense of childlike wonder and unwavering innocence. This decision also rippled through the production process, directly informing the director's choices regarding casting, performance direction, and even the visual style employed to highlight or contrast the character's maturity or lack thereof.

Actor Information
Full Name Freddie Highmore
Birth Date February 14, 1992
Birth Place London, England
Age at Filming 10 (during the principal photography of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" in 2004)
Occupation Actor
Education Cambridge University (Double First in Spanish and Arabic)
Notable Works "Finding Neverland," "August Rush," "The Spiderwick Chronicles," "Bates Motel," "The Good Doctor"
Awards Critics' Choice Movie Award for Best Young Performer (2005, 2006), Satellite Award for Best Actor Television Series Drama (2016)
Website Official Website

Freddie Highmore's portrayal of Charlie Bucket in the 2005 film "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" was profoundly shaped by his age. Understanding this nuanced detail unlocks critical insights into the casting choices, their deliberate effect on the film's narrative, and the lasting impact on the audience. It's a study in how a seemingly simple decision can reverberate through every frame of a film.

Highmore's tender years played a pivotal role in portraying Charlie Bucket's innocence and inherent vulnerability. This wasnt just about aesthetics; it was about creating a tangible sense of purity that resonated with audiences. The film's triumph lies in its ability to transport viewers back to their own childhood wonder, and Highmore's age was instrumental in achieving this feat. Furthermore, his youth presented unique logistical and creative hurdles during production, necessitating careful consideration in scene construction and performance direction. The actors age, therefore, emerged as a central, unavoidable element in crafting a specific and memorable on-screen representation of a beloved literary character. Grasping the implications of his age illuminates a fundamental aspect of how casting decisions echo throughout the entire filmmaking process.

The selection of Freddie Highmore to play Charlie Bucket wasn't just a lucky break; it was a strategically calculated move. His age was not merely a biographical detail, but a key factor in the casting director's pursuit of a convincing portrayal of childlike innocence and inherent vulnerability. Casting a performer who could convincingly embody these qualities was deemed essential. A more seasoned actor, even one possessing exceptional talent, might have struggled to recapture the untainted naivet so crucial to Charlies character arc and the overall narrative thrust of the film.

The significance of age in casting transcends the superficial; it delves into the very heart of character portrayal. Casting directors often engage in a meticulous process, weighing an actors physical characteristics, demonstrated acting prowess, and, critically, their suitability to inhabit the specific age and emotional landscape of the role. There's ample evidence suggesting that casting choices aligned with age appropriateness have contributed significantly to the success of countless films, allowing them to capture the true essence of a character and forge a lasting connection with audiences. Tim Burton's decision to cast Highmore likely stemmed from a desire to harness the actor's intrinsic youthful energy and unadulterated naivet, qualities deemed essential to unlocking a crucial element of Charlie's character development.

The decision to cast Freddie Highmore, a child actor, was intrinsically linked to the deliberate creation of Charlie Bucket's age portrayal. This connection exemplifies a crucial facet of the filmmaking process. In scenarios like this, casting transcends the mere selection of a capable performer; it becomes an act of sculpting a character portrayal that resonates deeply with the film's thematic undercurrents. This meticulous consideration significantly bolsters the films capacity to effectively convey its intended narrative and emotional payload, making it a more immersive and meaningful experience for the audience.

Freddie Highmore's age played an undeniable role in shaping the portrayal of Charlie Bucket in the 2005 cinematic adaptation of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory." This relationship between the actors actual age and the characters age is a critical component in achieving the desired narrative impact and fostering genuine audience engagement. It's a delicate balance that, when executed successfully, can elevate a performance from mere mimicry to a truly believable and emotionally resonant portrayal.

  • Authenticity and Emotional Impact

    Highmore's youthfulness served as a conduit to the believability of Charlie's character. A younger actor inherently possesses the capacity to convey the naivete, sense of wonder, and inherent vulnerability of a child thrust into extraordinary circumstances. This authenticity deeply resonated with audiences, fostering a profound emotional connection. The film's overall success hinged on the viewer's ability to empathize with Charlie, and Highmore's youthful presence proved instrumental in fostering that empathy. This approach, commonplace in effective storytelling, underscores the fundamental importance of aligning casting choices with core character traits and the desired emotional response.

  • Visual Representation of Innocence

    Visual cues related to age are paramount in establishing a character's emotional state. Highmore's age provided a tangible, visible representation of Charlie's inherent innocence and unblemished purity. This visual representation acted as a powerful reinforcement of the narrative's central theme: confronting temptation while maintaining unwavering integrity in the face of extraordinary temptations. The stark contrast between Charlie's simple, unadorned nature and the overwhelming opulence that surrounds him was heightened by the actors youth, making the narrative more compelling and visually striking.

  • Narrative Consistency

    The narrative architecture of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" is built upon the sharp contrast between Charlie's humble, impoverished origins and the extravagant, almost surreal world of Willy Wonka. Highmore's age played a direct and crucial role in establishing this critical juxtaposition. A more mature actor, even one skilled in the craft, might not have been able to convey the same sense of stark difference, potentially diminishing the narrative's intended emotional impact. The inherent coherence between the character's age and the narrative arc is a hallmark of successful storytelling, and Highmore's youthful visage became a powerful symbol, underscoring the profound gap between Charlies impoverished existence and the overwhelming spectacle he encounters within the chocolate factory.

Freddie Highmore's age in the film was not a random occurrence; it was a deliberate artistic choice, intimately woven into the fabric of the character portrayal, directly influencing the narrative's emotional impact and the film's visual language. By selecting a young actor, the filmmakers effectively conveyed Charlies defining qualities of innocence and vulnerability, forging a deeper, more meaningful connection with the audience and solidifying the narrative contrasts necessary for the story to resonate. This example stands as a compelling illustration of how casting choices, far from being superficial decisions, can significantly shape a character's portrayal and profoundly impact the overall reception of a film.

The age of Freddie Highmore, the actor who brought Charlie Bucket to life in the 2005 film adaptation of Roald Dahl's classic, had a marked influence on the narratives overall impact. Highmores youthfulness wasn't just a biographical fact; it was a meticulously chosen component that directly contributed to the narratives ability to achieve its intended emotional effect and immerse the audience in the story. The film's thematic focus on innocence, vulnerability, and the corrupting influence of temptation was rendered far more effectively through the lens of a younger actor, thereby creating a more palpable and impactful contrast with the decadent, often morally ambiguous world of Willy Wonka.

The narratives impact stemmed directly from the visual representation of Charlie's inherent naivet. A younger actor possessed the ability to convincingly portray the child's genuine awe and vulnerability in the face of such overwhelming extravagance. This visual authenticity served to amplify the narratives emotional core, thereby strengthening the bond between the character and the audience. This time-tested principle is a recurring element in effective cinematic storytelling, demonstrating how visual elements can seamlessly support and enhance the overall message. The film's ability to elicit genuine emotional responses from its audience hinged directly on the actor's capacity to portray the specific emotional qualities inherent in a child experiencing such extraordinary circumstances. The casting choice, therefore, emerged as a pivotal element in both creating and shaping the overall narrative experience, illustrating how the success of the film was inextricably intertwined with the subtle but powerful connection between the actor's age and the story's intended emotional weight.

The intricate interplay between Freddie Highmore's age and the narrative impact underscores the critical significance of thoughtful casting decisions in cinematic storytelling. The director's choice of Highmore had a tangible effect on the audience's emotional response and the film's overall narrative effectiveness, proving that such decisions extend far beyond mere practicality. This example serves to highlight the importance of aligning actor selection with the narratives thematic elements, maximizing the film's overall impact on viewers and solidifying its place in cinematic history. Such seemingly simple decisions, in reality, become crucial components of a films enduring success, demonstrating how thoughtful casting choices can profoundly affect a narratives ability to deeply resonate with audiences.

The enduring success of the 2005 film "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" can be attributed, in no small part, to the strategic casting of Freddie Highmore as Charlie Bucket. Highmore's age wasn't just a minor detail; it was a critical component in achieving the film's desired emotional impact and fostering a genuine connection with the audience. A younger actor, by virtue of their inherent innocence and unadulterated perspective, possessed the unique ability to convincingly embody the childlike wonder, vulnerability, and sheer awe of a child thrust into extraordinary circumstances. This, in turn, served to foster a deeper emotional connection with the viewing public, contributing significantly to the film's box office performance and its generally positive critical reception.

The connection between the actor's age and the films overarching success transcends mere anecdotal evidence. The casting choice served as a powerful means of emphasizing the narratives central themes. A more seasoned actor, even one of considerable talent, might not have been able to convey the stark contrast between Charlie's humble background and the overwhelming opulence surrounding him with the same degree of authenticity. This contrast is vitally important to the story's intended emotional impact, providing a tangible representation of the vast differences in experience and opportunity. The visual embodiment of Charlie's unblemished innocence, so readily achieved through Highmore's youth, heightened the narrative's inherent power, resulting in a more potent and compelling cinematic experience for viewers. Numerous other films have demonstrated similar connections, further solidifying the idea that a young actors portrayal of a specific age serves to enhance a film's ability to evoke a powerful emotional response and maintain the thematic consistency so crucial for sustained audience engagement.

The 2005 adaptation of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" exemplifies how a specific actor's age can directly influence a film's ultimate success and lasting impact. Casting choices, particularly when strategically aligned with the narrative's emotional core and overall visual representation, can significantly impact the audience's reception and long-term appreciation of the work. This critical link between the actor's portrayal of character age and the film's overall success is a crucial consideration for filmmakers, serving as a powerful demonstration of how casting decisions can substantially contribute to a production's ultimate outcome and the enduring audience response. This correlation underscores the importance of consciously aligning casting choices with the films intended thematic and emotional essence, ultimately maximizing its overall impact on viewers and ensuring its place in cinematic history.

Freddie Highmore's age at the time of filming "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" introduced specific challenges during the production. As a young actor, Highmore possessed a limited amount of professional experience, necessitating thoughtful accommodations and adjustments across various aspects of the production. This included crafting scenes that effectively harnessed his youthful energy and natural naivet while simultaneously avoiding the common pitfalls associated with directing actors who are relatively unfamiliar with complex dramatic situations. Had the role been filled by a different actor, one less ideally suited to embody the required level of childlike innocence, it would have necessitated substantial alterations to the screenplay and the established filming protocols, potentially affecting the overall pacing of the narrative and the intended emotional impact of key scenes. This underscores the direct relationship between the actor's age and the technical demands placed upon the production team.

The specific requirements of portraying Charlie Buckets emotional arc, including his varied reactions to the eccentric Willy Wonka and the challenges presented by the chocolate factory trials, required careful, deliberate direction. The director bore the responsibility of ensuring that Highmore's age-appropriate performance effectively conveyed the characters internal struggles and ultimate triumphs. This required the implementation of specialized techniques for directing child actors, including the use of carefully tailored dialogue, meticulously choreographed scenes, and the provision of appropriate physical prompts to help guide the actors performance. Any misjudgments in these areas could have potentially compromised the narratives emotional impact, further emphasizing the significance of casting a young actor with the requisite acting ability to skillfully navigate this particular role. Maintaining the unwavering authenticity of Charlies youthful innocence, a critical component of the films overall narrative success, became a central concern for the production teams involved.

Understanding the connection between the specific production challenges and the actor's age emphasizes the importance of carefully considering a range of factors, including experience level, emotional maturity, and overall suitability for a specific role, during the pre-production stages. Such deliberate consideration is essential for achieving truly successful filmmaking outcomes. This particular case demonstrates that the films enduring success was directly tied to the careful orchestration of production elements in direct response to the unique demands posed by the actor's youthful character portrayal. This nuanced understanding of the interconnectedness of these elements is invaluable, potentially informing future decision-making in similar production contexts and further solidifying the principles of effective filmmaking.

The audience's overall reception of the 2005 film "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" was, in part, profoundly influenced by the age of Freddie Highmore, the actor entrusted with bringing Charlie Bucket to life on the silver screen. The perceived authenticity and overall appropriateness of the actors portrayal directly impacted the way in which audiences perceived the character and, ultimately, the overall success and impact of the film. This critical relationship serves to further underscore the paramount significance of carefully considered casting decisions in achieving the desired audience responses and ensuring the film's lasting legacy.

  • Perceived Authenticity

    Audiences often evaluate cinematic performances, consciously or unconsciously, based on the perceived realism and authenticity of the portrayal. Highmore's youthfulness likely contributed significantly to creating a strong sense of authenticity for the character of Charlie. A younger actor possesses the unique ability to more convincingly embody the inherent naivet and underlying vulnerability of a child navigating a series of extraordinary circumstances. Conversely, a more mature actor, even one possessing significant talent, might not have resonated as strongly with audience members who sought to connect with Charlie's inherent and genuine innocence. This aligns directly with well-established audience expectations regarding effective character portrayal and the overall importance of thoughtful, well-considered casting choices.

  • Emotional Connection

    The overall emotional impact of a film is often inextricably linked to the audience's capacity to genuinely empathize with the characters depicted on screen. Highmore's age served as a key factor in fostering this critical emotional connection. Audiences, generally speaking, found it far easier to connect on an emotional level with a younger actor embodying Charlie's innate sense of wonder, unblemished innocence, and inherent vulnerability, especially when contrasted with the pervasive extravagance and potential moral corruption that surrounds him. The actor's age, therefore, played an indispensable role in shaping the audience's overall engagement with both the character and the overall narrative arc of the film.

  • Visual Representation of Age

    The visual presentation of age is of paramount importance in the art of filmmaking. Highmore's age ensured a visual representation of Charlies childhood that seamlessly matched the narrative expectations already established within the source material. This overall visual coherence served to strengthen the audience's understanding and engagement with the character's complex emotional journey, further immersing them within the overall narrative context. Consequently, the overall effectiveness of the film, and its ability to transport viewers to another world, relied heavily on the accurate and believable depiction of the child character, an effect that was achieved, in large part, through the strategic and deliberate casting of an actor whose actual age aligned with the demands of the role.

  • Comparative Reception

    Comparative analysis of audience responses to similar films might reveal a range of consistent patterns and established expectations. Films that successfully capture the inherent essence of childhood or the core principles of innocence often feature young actors cast in the lead roles. The audiences inherent familiarity with this established pattern of the visual representation of age might subtly influence their overall acceptance of Highmore in the role and contribute to the film's perceived authenticity, further solidifying its overall impact. The film's overall potential for success, in this specific case, was significantly influenced by audience expectations of age-appropriate character portrayals as established within similar films already present in the cinematic landscape.

The age of Freddie Highmore in "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" was intricately and inextricably linked to the film's overall audience reception. The audiences perception of authenticity, their ability to form a strong emotional connection with the character, the overall visual coherence achieved through the casting, and pre-existing comparative reception patterns all served to contribute to the films overall success. Highmores age, therefore, evolved into a key element in forging a lasting and meaningful connection with viewers, emphasizing how casting decisions, when strategically aligned with the narrative's core demands, can profoundly impact the audiences overall experience and lasting appreciation of a film.

Examining the historical context surrounding Freddie Highmore's age during the production of the 2005 film "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" yields essential insights into both the initial casting decisions and the ultimate audience reception. An understanding of the prevailing cultural and societal norms of that specific period provides crucial context, allowing for a far more nuanced and informed comprehension of this seemingly minor detail. The films overall success, as well as any potential production challenges, were not isolated occurrences; rather, they were inextricably situated within a specific and definable historical moment.

  • Filmmaking Practices of the Early 2000s

    The established filmmaking practices of the early 2000s significantly influenced the casting choices made for "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory." Casting directors, by and large, placed a high premium on authenticity, often prioritizing actors whose physical attributes and overall demeanor aligned most closely with the projected image of the character. The emphasis on using child actors to portray child characters was a particularly prevalent trend within films produced during this era. Highmore's age, falling squarely within the established parameters of a child actor who was demonstrably capable of portraying Charlie's core qualities of innocence and vulnerability, reflected the prevailing casting conventions that were widely in use at the time. This approach was influenced by a clear expectation among filmmakers that audiences would expect a relatable and emotionally resonant portrayal of the child protagonist, a well-established expectation within this genre and cinematic period.

  • Cultural Perceptions of Childhood

    The prevailing cultural perception of childhood during the early 2000s significantly impacted the narratives overall portrayal of key themes and characters. The film may have been purposefully crafted with a specific and targeted audience response in mind, deliberately drawing upon widely held notions of innocence, inherent naivet, and underlying vulnerability, all of which are commonly associated with children during this period. Audiences of the time almost certainly expected child actors to embody these qualities in a manner that felt both authentic and relatable. While the specific perception of what might constitute a believable and relatable child character varied across different audience demographics, Highmores age was likely a crucial component in achieving the desired effect of forging a lasting connection between the character and the films intended viewership.

  • Industry Standards for Child Actors

    The existing industry standards governing child actors and the specific roles they were deemed suitable for played a significant role in the overall casting decision. Specific legal and ethical considerations governing the employment of child actors, particularly regarding their overall well-being, were also likely to have been significant factors during the production. These underlying factors inevitably influenced the ultimate choice of an actor whose age was both appropriate for the demands of the role and in alignment with the existing standards, inevitably impacting the overall production timelines, specific scene requirements, and the prevailing budgetary constraints under which the film was ultimately produced. This was by no means unique to this specific movie; the vast majority of films featuring young actors had to contend with similar considerations and legal limitations. Highmore's specific age likely aligned with the broader industry standards in place for portraying a believable child character within that particular period.

An understanding of the relevant historical context provides a solid framework for appreciating the casting choice of Freddie Highmore in "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory." The interconnectedness of the prevailing filmmaking practices, the common societal perceptions of childhood, and the established industry standards for the employment and treatment of child actors all contributed to shaping the overall production and, ultimately, influencing the audiences interpretation of the films underlying message. The casting decision, viewed in this context, was by no means arbitrary; rather, it was the direct outcome of numerous interwoven factors, all reflecting the prevailing historical trends and established norms of the era. This understanding significantly enriches the overall analysis of the films production and its subsequent reception by moving beyond the immediate portrayal of the characters to encompass the far wider historical landscape within which the film was conceived and executed.

This section addresses common inquiries regarding Freddie Highmore's age during the production of the 2005 film adaptation of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory." The following questions and answers seek to provide clarification on this specific casting detail and its implications for the overall film production and subsequent reception.

Question 1: What was Freddie Highmore's age during filming?


Freddie Highmore was 10 years old when filming commenced on "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory." This age was a critical factor that was deliberately considered during the entire casting process and significantly contributed to his eventual portrayal of the iconic character of Charlie Bucket.

Question 2: How did Highmore's age influence the character portrayal?


Highmores inherent youthfulness directly impacted his subsequent portrayal of Charlie's innocence and his underlying vulnerability. As a younger actor, he was far more readily able to convey the character's sense of wonder, pervasive naivet, and overall emotional response to the many extraordinary circumstances that he encountered throughout the narrative. This sense of authenticity, in turn, served to foster a far deeper and more enduring emotional connection with the vast viewing public.

Question 3: Did Highmore's age present production challenges?


Highmore's relative inexperience at the time inevitably presented a variety of specific production challenges. Scenes required careful, deliberate direction in order to effectively utilize his youthful energy while also avoiding the inherent difficulties often associated with guiding a young actor through the demanding complexities of dramatic situations. This necessitated the careful crafting of tailored dialogue, the creation of meticulous choreography, and the provision of specifically targeted prompting methods designed to guide the young performer.

Question 4: How did Highmore's age impact the film's success?


Highmore's age evolved into a crucial component in the film's overall success. The clear authenticity of his on-screen portrayal contributed greatly to the film's ultimate ability to achieve its intended emotional effect and to deeply resonate with audiences on a variety of levels. The visually accurate depiction of Charlie's age also served to enhance the narrative contrast between his simple background and the overwhelming opulence of Willy Wonkas world, further bolstering the film's overall emotional core and ensuring its long-term success.

Question 5: What role did historical context play regarding Highmore's age?


The surrounding historical context, including the industrys prevailing filmmaking practices and the dominant cultural perceptions of childhood throughout the early 2000s, greatly influenced the overall decision to cast Highmore in the central role. The well-established prevalence of casting young actors for child roles during that particular period, together with industry standards governing the treatment and employment of child actors, added to the long-term significance of Highmores specific age within the overall context of the films production and eventual reception.

Understanding Freddie Highmore's age during the production of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" reveals many of the inherent intricacies involved in large-scale film production. Casting decisions, in the end, are not simple or isolated choices; rather, they are inextricably interwoven with a complex web of various factors, including a film's production challenges, the overall influence of prevailing cultural norms, and a directors underlying desire to achieve a highly specific emotional impact on the viewing audience. All of these various elements ultimately contribute to the films ability to find success with a variety of different viewers.

The casting of Freddie Highmore as Charlie Bucket in the 2005 film "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" was not a random act. Highmore's age at the time of filming was a decisive element in shaping the character's portrayal and the film's overall success. The narrative's core themes of innocence and vulnerability were directly accentuated by the actor's youthful appearance. This visual authenticity amplified the narrative's contrast between Charlie's humble origins and the opulence surrounding him, consequently deepening the emotional impact on viewers. Production challenges, such as tailoring scenes to suit a young actor and ensuring age-appropriate performances, were also substantially influenced by Highmore's age. Moreover, audience reception was arguably shaped by the perceived authenticity of the portrayal, fostering an emotional connection between the character and viewers. This connection, ultimately, contributed to the film's critical and commercial success. The interplay between actors age, character portrayal, and audience reception highlights the multi-faceted role that casting choices play in cinematic storytelling.

The case of Freddie Highmore and "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" serves as a potent illustration of the intricate interplay between artistic vision, technical demands, and audience response within the filmmaking process. Careful consideration of an actors age is not merely a technical detail; it is a crucial aspect of realizing a films intended narrative and emotional impact. Analyzing this specific casting decision offers valuable insight into the nuances of cinematic storytelling and the profound influence that an actor's age and experience can have on a film's enduring appeal.


Is Freddie Highmore Autistic in Real Life? ThePopTimes

Is Freddie Highmore Autistic in Real Life? ThePopTimes

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory star Freddie Highmore looked

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory star Freddie Highmore looked

Freddie Highmore Interesting Facts, Age, Net Worth, Biography, Wiki

Freddie Highmore Interesting Facts, Age, Net Worth, Biography, Wiki

Detail Author:

  • Name : Dr. Aleen Wiza
  • Username : lakin.graciela
  • Email : hyman64@hotmail.com
  • Birthdate : 1999-08-01
  • Address : 45539 Jaskolski Forges South Savanah, MI 51092
  • Phone : +1-689-949-9058
  • Company : Johnson Inc
  • Job : Alteration Tailor
  • Bio : Quasi aliquid exercitationem necessitatibus aut nihil. Et ipsum facilis eum ducimus laudantium est. Qui vel at labore dolorem.

Socials

instagram:

  • url : https://instagram.com/stacymuller
  • username : stacymuller
  • bio : Blanditiis sapiente ut ipsam ut. Vel laudantium et ab sint doloremque nihil.
  • followers : 5778
  • following : 476

tiktok:

  • url : https://tiktok.com/@stacy_xx
  • username : stacy_xx
  • bio : Quisquam magni voluptatem laudantium veritatis vitae.
  • followers : 4860
  • following : 1350

linkedin:

twitter:

  • url : https://twitter.com/smuller
  • username : smuller
  • bio : Molestias omnis quaerat qui aliquam est recusandae. Id tempore eum iste amet vero quo. Nobis aut hic aliquid reprehenderit.
  • followers : 3190
  • following : 377